Volume 1, Issue 1 (5-2017)                   SBRH 2017, 1(1): 49-59 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mazidi Sharafabadi V. The Causes of Smoking and the Solutions to Control it in Tehran. SBRH. 2017; 1 (1) :49-59
URL: http://sbrh.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-29-en.html
School of Sociology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1016 Views)

Background: Smoking is one of the leading causes of disease and death in the world. There is a growing trend of smoking in Iran, especially among youth and women. This study has been conducted to identify the factors related to smoking and solutions that can lead to its control in Tehran.

Methods: This study was conducted qualitatively from August 2015 to August 2016 in Tehran. The data collection tool included cognitive interviews and deep, semi-structured interviews. The participants consisted of 7 men and 5 women who smoked cigarettes; they were selected through purposive sampling with maximum diversity and snowball technique which continued until data saturation. The data was analyzed through qualitative conventional content analysis.

Results: Two main classes with 15 subclasses were extracted from the participants’ responses. The causes of smoking and the solutions for its control are evaluated along these two classes. The subclasses include factors like being accustomed to smoking, considering smoking as a normal behavior, easy access to cigarettes, recreation and entertainment; lack of recreational facilities, way of relaxing, increasing the price of cigarettes, the importance of making cigarettes scarce, and cultural and individual volition.

Conclusion: Being accustomed to smoking and considering it as an entertainment are the most important causes of smoking, and the importance of creating an anti-smoking culture and individual volition have been introduced as the most important solutions for controlling smoking in Tehran. Furthermore, it seems that reducing the public access to cigarette through various ways such as increasing the price, reducing the imports, the decline in production and supply, as well as creating a culture against smoking can reduce the amount of smoking considerably.

Full-Text [PDF 370 kb]   (2076 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (145 Views)  
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2017/01/12 | Accepted: 2017/05/6 | Published: 2017/05/22

1. Xu X, Dockery DW, Ware JH, Speizer FE, Ferris Jr BG. Effects of cigarette smoking on rate of loss of pulmonary function in adults: A longitudinal assessment. American Review of Respiratory Disease. 1992;146(5):1345-1348. [DOI:10.1164/ajrccm/146.5_Pt_1.1345]
2. Baška T, Warren CW, Bašková M, Jones NR. Prevalence of youth cigarette smoking and selected social factors in 25 European countries: Findings from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey. International Journal of Public Health. 2009;54(6):439-445. [DOI:10.1007/s00038-009-0051-9]
3. Moeini B, Poorolajal J, Gharlipour Gharghani Z. Prevalence of cigarette smoking and associated risk factors among adolescents in Hamadan City, west of Iran in 2010. Journal of Research in Health Sciences. 2012;12(1):31-37. [PMID]
4. Goli S, Mahjub H, Moghimbeigi A, Poorolajal J, Heidari Pahlavian A. Application of mixture models for estimating the prevalence of cigarette smoking in Hamadan, Iran. Journal of Research in Health Sciences. 2010;10(2):110-115. [PMID]
5. Sarraf-Zadegan N, Boshtam M, Shahrokhi S, et al. Tobacco use among Iranian men, women and adolescents. European Journal of Public Health. 2004;14(1):76-78. [DOI:10.1093/eurpub/14.1.76] [PMID]
6. Regidor E, Pascual C, Giráldez-García C, Galindo S, Martínez D, Kunst AE. Impact of tobacco prices and smoke-free policy on smoking cessation, by gender and educational group: Spain, 1993-2012. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2015;26(12):1215-1221. [DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.05.011]
7. Tan W. The effects of taxes and advertising restrictions on the market structure of the US cigarette market. Review of Industrial Organization. 2006;28(3):231-251. [DOI:10.1007/s11151-006-0015-7]
8. Onal AE, Tumerdem Y, Ozel S. Smoking addiction among university students in Istanbul. Addiction biology. 2002;7(4):397-402. [DOI:10.1080/1355621021000005982]
9. Saunders C. Access to cigarettes by daily smokers in Florida's public middle schools and high schools. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2011;13(7):589-98. [DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntr047]
10. Hammal F, Mock J, Ward KD, Eissenberg T, Maziak W. A pleasure among friends: how narghile (waterpipe) smoking differs from cigarette smoking in Syria. Tobacco Control. 2008;17(2). [DOI:10.1136/tc.2007.020529]
11. Cremers HP, Mercken L, De Vries H, Oenema A. A longitudinal study on determinants of the intention to start smoking among Non-smoking boys and girls of high and low socioeconomic status. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):648. [DOI:10.1186/s12889-015-1917-9]
12. Watanabe I, Shigeta M, Inoue K, et al. Personal Factors Associated with Smoking Among Marginalized and Disadvantaged Youth in Japan. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2013;20(4):504-513. [DOI:10.1007/s12529-012-9268-8]
13. Lopez B, Huang S, Wang W, et al. Intrapersonal and ecodevelopmental factors associated with smoking in Hispanic adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2010;19(4):492-503. [DOI:10.1007/s10826-009-9321-7]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Social Behavior Research & Health

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb