Volume 2, Issue 2 (11-2018)
JSBCH 2018, 2(2): 219-227 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zareei Mahmoodabadi H, Zarei F. The Effect of Divorce Counseling based on Gottman's Approach on the Self-Efficacy in Divorce Management of Couples Applying for Divorce. JSBCH 2018; 2 (2) :219-227
URL: http://sbrh.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-73-en.html
URL: http://sbrh.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-73-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran. , zareei_h@yahoo.com
2- Department of Sociology, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
2- Department of Sociology, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
Abstract: (4770 Views)
Background: Today, couples applying for divorce need more self-efficacy in their divorce management.
Self-efficacy in divorce management helps divorcing couples make the right decision to continue their married life or leave. The present study aimed to determine the effect of divorce counseling based on Gottman's approach on self-efficacy in divorce management within couples who applied for divorce in Yazd.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study was based on pre-test, post-test, and follow-up method in which the case-control group design was applied. The study population included all couples who applied for divorce in Yazd in 2017. We selected 32 participants using purposive sampling, who were then divided into experimental and control groups. In order to collect the study data, we used Zareei's self-efficacy questionnaire in divorce management. To analyze the data, we run multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), two-way analysis of variance, and repeated measurement tests.
Results: The results of MANOVA analysis indicated that the experimental group used self-efficacy more frequently than the control group in divorce management and its subscales. Moreover, analysis of two-way variance showed that gender did not have a significant correlation with the training results. In other words, the effect of education was the same for both genders. Moreover, the results of repeated measurement analysis indicated significant differences between the levels (pre test with post test and follow up).
Conclusion: Gottman-based divorce counseling affected self-efficacy in divorce management of couples applying for divorce in Yazd. The effectiveness of this training was the same for both males and females. As a result, for those couples who want to divorce, such training seems to be extremely necessary.
Self-efficacy in divorce management helps divorcing couples make the right decision to continue their married life or leave. The present study aimed to determine the effect of divorce counseling based on Gottman's approach on self-efficacy in divorce management within couples who applied for divorce in Yazd.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study was based on pre-test, post-test, and follow-up method in which the case-control group design was applied. The study population included all couples who applied for divorce in Yazd in 2017. We selected 32 participants using purposive sampling, who were then divided into experimental and control groups. In order to collect the study data, we used Zareei's self-efficacy questionnaire in divorce management. To analyze the data, we run multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), two-way analysis of variance, and repeated measurement tests.
Results: The results of MANOVA analysis indicated that the experimental group used self-efficacy more frequently than the control group in divorce management and its subscales. Moreover, analysis of two-way variance showed that gender did not have a significant correlation with the training results. In other words, the effect of education was the same for both genders. Moreover, the results of repeated measurement analysis indicated significant differences between the levels (pre test with post test and follow up).
Conclusion: Gottman-based divorce counseling affected self-efficacy in divorce management of couples applying for divorce in Yazd. The effectiveness of this training was the same for both males and females. As a result, for those couples who want to divorce, such training seems to be extremely necessary.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Psychology
Received: 2018/05/30 | Accepted: 2018/12/4 | Published: 2019/01/13
Received: 2018/05/30 | Accepted: 2018/12/4 | Published: 2019/01/13
References
1. Ferraro AJ, Oehme K, Bruker M, Arpan L, Opel A. The impact of training videos on attitudes about parenting after divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2018:1-1. [DOI:10.1080/10502556.2018.1466253]
2. Wilder SE. Predicting adjustment to divorce from social support and relational quality in multiple relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2016;57(8):553-572. [DOI:10.1080/10502556.2016.1233844]
3. Zareei Mahmoodabadi H. The effectiveness of retraining attribution styles on dimensions of family functioning in divorce applicant couples. Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2014;4(3): 367-387.
4. Gottman JM. A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology. 1993;7(1):57. [DOI:10.1037/0893-3200.7.1.57]
5. Zareei Mahmoodabadi H. Investigating the predictive factors of tendency to divorce, developing an indigenous intervention model and its effectiveness on the desire and efficiency of divorce management in divorce applicant couples in Yazd. [Doctorate Thesis]. Iran. Isfahan University, Faculty of Education and Psychology; 2012. [Persian]
6. Gottman JM, Silver N. The seven principles for making marriage work: A practical guide from the country's foremost relationship expert. Harmony; 2015. [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Pourmovahed Z, Mahmoodabad SS, Zareei Mahmoodabadi H, Tavangar H, Ardekani SM, Vaezi AA. Family stability and conflict of spiritual beliefs and superstitions among Yazdi people in Iran: A qualitative study. Middle East Journal of Family Medicine. 2017;7(10):97. [DOI:10.5742/MEWFM.2017.93108]
8. Pourmovahed Z, Mahmoodabad SS, Zareei Mahmoodabadi H, Tavangar H, Ardekani SM, Vaezi AA. Deficiency of self-efficacy in problem-solving as a contributory factor in family instability: A qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry. 2018;13(1):32. [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Zareei Mahmoodabadi H. Examination of attachment styles and personality factors as predictors of divorce in normal and divorce applicant couples in Yazd, Iran. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2013;2(4):554-572.
10. Faryabi F, Zareei Mahmoodabadi H. Comparative Study of Marital Adaptation, Happiness and Divorce Inclination in Traditional and Non Traditional Marriages. Toloo e Behdasht. 2015;14(3):83-94.
11. Sohrabi N, Hosseini SM, Hoshyar H. Comparison of general health, social adjustment, happiness, life expectancy and emotional intelligence among divorced women with or without sexual relation. The Social Sciences. 2016; 11:3610-3617.
12. Amato PR. The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2000;62(4):1269-87. [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x]
13. Tejada Vera B, Sutton PD. Births, marriages, divorces, and deaths: Provisional data for 2009. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2010;58(25): 1-6.
14. Kaslow FW, Schwartz LL. The dynamics of divorce: A life cycle perspective. Philadelphia, PA, US: Brunner,Mazel; 1987. [PMCID]
15. Wilder SE. Predicting adjustment to divorce from social support and relational quality in multiple relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2016;57(8):553-72. [DOI:10.1080/10502556.2016.1233844]
16. Saadati H, Lashani L. Effectiveness of gestalt therapy on self-efficacy of divorced women. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;84:1171-1174. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.721]
17. Zareei Mahmoodabadi H, Younesi J. The effectiveness of cognitive techniques on improvement of family function in mal adjusted couples. Journal of Daneshvar Raftar. 2009;29:35-52.
18. Arizi HR, Farahani H. Research methods in clinical psychology and counseling. Iran: Danje; 1998.
19. Gall MD, Borg WR, Gall Joyce. Educational Research an Introduction. (Translated by Nasr R). Iran, Tehran: Samt Publication. 1998.
20. Haseley JL. Marital satisfaction among newly married couples: Associations with religiosity and romantic attachment style. [Unpublished Doctorate Thesis]. University of North Texas. 2006.
21. Finzi R, Cohen O, Ram A. Attachment and divorce. Journal of Family Psychotherapy. 2000;11(1):1-20. [DOI:10.1300/J085v11n01_01]
22. Cooper C. The new handbook of psychotherapy and counseling with men: A comprehensive guide to settings, problems, and treatment approaches, revised edition. California: Jossey-Francisco; 2001. P:335-352.
23. Bray JH, Jouriles EN. Treatment of marital conflict and prevention of divorce. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1995;21(4):461-473. [DOI:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00175.x]
24. Buss DM, Shackelford TK. Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality. 1997;31(2):193-221. [DOI:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2175]
25. Davoodi Z. Investigating the effect of the solution-based approach on decreasing tendency toward divorce in susceptible women and men in Isfahan. [MSc Thesis]. Iran. Isfahan University, Faculty of Education and Psychology; 1999. [Persian]
26. Frisby BN, Booth Butterfield M, Dillow MR, Martin MM, Weber KD. Face and resilience in divorce: The impact on emotions, stress, and post-divorce relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2012;29(6):715-735. [DOI:10.1177/0265407512443452]
27. Emery R. Marriage, divorce, and children's adjustment. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;1999.
28. Arkes J. The temporal effects of divorces and separations on children's academic achievement and problem behavior. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2015 2;56(1):25-42.
29. Peleg OR. The relation between differentiation and social anxiety: What can be learned from students and their parents?. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 2005;33(2):167-183. [DOI:10.1080/01926180590921403]
30. Mahmoodabadi HZ, Bahrami F, Ahmadi A, Etemadi O, Zadeh MS. The effectiveness of retraining attribution styles (cognitive therapy) on dimensions of family functioning in divorce applicant couples. International Journal of Psychological Studies. 2012;4(2):257. [DOI:10.5539/ijps.v4n2p257]
31. Mahmoodabadi HZ, Sardadvar N, Nasirian M. Effectiveness of psycho educational intervention in improving symptoms of patients with obsessive compulsive disorder and general family functioning of companions. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2018. [In Press] [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.58377]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
