Volume 2, Issue 1 (5-2018)
JSBCH 2018, 2(1): 189-198 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bagheri D, Arefi M, Rafei F. Pathology of Industrial Drug Abuse Tendency in Gorgan. JSBCH 2018; 2 (1) :189-198
URL: http://sbrh.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-59-en.html
URL: http://sbrh.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-59-en.html
1- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran. , danielbagherii@gmail.com
2- Mental Health Center, Welfare Administration, Gorgan, Iran.
3- Pcycology Department, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Center Branch, Tehran, Iran.
2- Mental Health Center, Welfare Administration, Gorgan, Iran.
3- Pcycology Department, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Center Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (3383 Views)
Background: Industrial Drug addiction is considered as one of the most serious social problems in Iran. It has various aspects of sociology, psychology, law, and politics. This study was conducted with the aim of pathology of the most important factors influencing the tendency of people to industrial drug in Gorgan.
Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study was performed on 400 addicts in Gorgan. The statistical population of this study was people aged 15 - 60 years old who were consuming industrial drugs in Gorgan, as well as addicts in Addiction Retreat Camps in Gorgan. The sample size was 386 using Cochran's formula, which was promoted to 400 people for certainty. The samples were selected by stratified random sampling method. The data gathering tool was a researcher-made questionnaire whose reliability was determined after calculating 0.87. Data was collected by field method and data was analyzed using SPSS software.
Results: The findings of the research showed that the age group of 15 - 25 years old with 43.2% had the highest tendency to industrial drug abuse. The variables of individual factors, family role and status, relationship with friends and peers have a significant and direct relationship with the tendency towards industrial drug abuse However, educational level and economic status variables did not have a significant relationship with the tendency towards industrial drug abuse. The results of statistical tests indicate that communication with friends and peers has had the greatest impact on the tendency of people who have been subjected to industrial drug abuse.
Conclusion: Considering that nearly half of the subjects 43.2% were about 20 years old and 49.3% were single and unemployed, they could control the tendency towards industrial drugs by creating educational and employment programs in the province.
Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study was performed on 400 addicts in Gorgan. The statistical population of this study was people aged 15 - 60 years old who were consuming industrial drugs in Gorgan, as well as addicts in Addiction Retreat Camps in Gorgan. The sample size was 386 using Cochran's formula, which was promoted to 400 people for certainty. The samples were selected by stratified random sampling method. The data gathering tool was a researcher-made questionnaire whose reliability was determined after calculating 0.87. Data was collected by field method and data was analyzed using SPSS software.
Results: The findings of the research showed that the age group of 15 - 25 years old with 43.2% had the highest tendency to industrial drug abuse. The variables of individual factors, family role and status, relationship with friends and peers have a significant and direct relationship with the tendency towards industrial drug abuse However, educational level and economic status variables did not have a significant relationship with the tendency towards industrial drug abuse. The results of statistical tests indicate that communication with friends and peers has had the greatest impact on the tendency of people who have been subjected to industrial drug abuse.
Conclusion: Considering that nearly half of the subjects 43.2% were about 20 years old and 49.3% were single and unemployed, they could control the tendency towards industrial drugs by creating educational and employment programs in the province.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Social Health
Received: 2017/12/16 | Accepted: 2018/05/15 | Published: 2018/05/15
Received: 2017/12/16 | Accepted: 2018/05/15 | Published: 2018/05/15
References
1. Ahmadi J, Hasani M. Prevalence of substance use among Iranian high school students. Addictive behaviors. 2003;28(2):375-379. [DOI:10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00246-5]
2. Dehghani K, Zare A, Dehghani H, Sedghi H, Poormovahed Z. Drug abuse prevalence and risk factors in students of Shaheed Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd. SSU Journals. 2010;18 (3):164-169.
3. Thege BK, Colman I, Elguebaly N, et al. Social judgments of behavioral versus substance related addictions: A population based study. Addictive Behaviors. 2015;42(2):24-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.025] [PMID]
4. Yekkehfallah L, Momeni A, Torkashvand A, Jahani Hashemi H. Factors Associated with Ecstasy Use in Students of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Hayat. 2009;15(2):73-80.
5. Pauly V, Frauger E, Rouby F, et al. Analysis of addictive behaviours among new prisoners in France using the OPPIDUM program. L'Encephale. 2010;36(2):122-131. [DOI:10.1016/j.encep.2009.03.011] [PMID]
6. Sarrami H, Ghorbami M, Taghavi M. The survey two decades of prevalence studies among Iran university students. Research on Addiction. 2012;7(27):36-39.
7. Norgard LS, Laursen MK, Lassen S. Knowledge, attitudes, behavior and polydrug use among ecstasy users Alondon study. Journal of Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2001;18(2):51-58.
8. Rakhshani F, Sepehri Z, Keikha M, Rakhshani T, Ebrahimi MR. Associated Factors of Paan Use in Southeast Iran. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2011;13(9):659-663. [DOI:10.5812/kowsar.20741804.2249]
9. Bakhshipour A, Bagherian khosroshahi S. Psychometric properties of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised - Short Form (EPQ-RS). Contemporary Psychology Journal. 2007;1(2):3-12.
10. Taheri F, Yaraghi A, Sabzghabaee AM, et al. Methadone toxicity in a poisoning referral center. Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice. 2013;2(3):130-134. [DOI:10.4103/2279-042X.122387] [PMID]
11. Sekhavat J. Drug addiction and trafficking. 2nd ed. Tehran: Agah Publishing; 2002 [PMID]
12. Yarmohammadi Vasel M, Ghanadi F. Study of the transition from non-injection to injection in heroin users. Scientific Journal of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. 2010;17(2):50-56.
13. Sabahy AR, Divsalar K, Bahreinifar S, Marzban M, Nakhaee N. Waterpipe tobacco use among Iranian university students: Correlates and perceived reasons for use. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. 2011;15(6):844–847. [DOI:10.5588/ijtld.10.0744] [PMID]
14. Chiang SC, Chen SJ, Sun HJ, Chan HY, Chen WJ. Heroin use among youths incarcerated for illicit drug use: Psychosocial environment, substance use history, psychiatric comorbidity, and route of administration. The American journal on addictions. 2006;15(3):233-241. [DOI:10.1080/10550490600626473] [PMID]
15. Siyam Sh. Drug abuse prevalence between male students of different universities in Rasht in 2005. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2007;8(4):279-285.
16. Cohen BJ, Orbuch TL. Introduction to sociology. 1st ed. College Book Series McGraw-Hill's, college review books series; 1990.
17. Ritzer G. Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1992 [PMID]
18. Giddens A, Sutton P. Sociology. 7th ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2013.
19. Abadinsky H. Drug use and abuse: A comprehensive introduction. 8th ed. Cengage Learning; 2005. P:154.
20. Drake R. Dual diagnosis and integrated treatment of mental illness and substance abuse disorder. Psychiatric Services. 2003;41:328-335.
21. Farnaghi F, Jafari N, Mehregan FF. Methadone poisoning among children referred to Loghman-Hakim hospital in 2009. Pajoohandeh Journal. 2012;16(6):299-303.
22. Chen, J. Revisiting early sociological studies on addiction: Interactions with collectives, History of the Human Sciences. 2014;27(5):111-125. [DOI:10.1177/0952695114529433]
23. Vahdat Shariat Panahi SM, Shahbazi S. The pattern of drug abuse in anonymous adidcts. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2010;11(1).
24. Dakof GA, Tejeda M, Liddle HA. Predictors of engagement in adolescent drug abuse treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2001;40(3):274-281. [DOI:10.1097/00004583-200103000-00006] [PMID]
25. Razzaghi EM, Movaghar AR, Green TC, Khoshnood K. Profiles of risk: A qualitative study of injecting drug users in Tehran, Iran. Harm Reduction Journal. 2006;3:12. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7517-3-12] [PMID]
26. Moasheri N, Miri MR, Mashreghi MH, Eslami MR. A study of Birjand University students' knowledge and attitude towards taking Ecstasy pills. Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2006;13(4):9-15.
27. Abassi A, Taziki S, Moradi A. The Protype of Drug mis abused of Opioids in the Self-Introduced Addicts in Gorgan. Journal of Gorgan University of Medical Sciences. 2006;8(17):22-7.
28. Holman Rc. Emotion and motive effects on druy related cognition, Hand book of addictive disorders apractical Guide to diahnosis and treatment. USA: Published John Wiley & Sons, New Jery; 2004.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
